Skip to main content

J2EE's Growing Pains

Given the discussion some of us in the CF community have been having lately about the affect alternative CFML engines have on CF as a whole, I thought this article about what's going on in the J2EE world these days was pretty interesting:

Alternative Frameworks: Bad for J2EE ... or Good?

On one front, the commoditization of things like app servers may lead to the big J2EE players to abandon their commercial offerings if they're no longer profitable. (I don't agree with this argument at all, but it's one that's frequently made.)

On another front, many in the Java world are challenging the complexities of J2EE and coming up with alternative frameworks such as Spring (dev framework) and Hibernate (persistence framework). These alternatives are more lightweight and easier to use than their heavier counterparts, but some argue that it starts to water down the standards.

On the CF side of the world, these arguments are very analogous to the situation with Macromedia's ColdFusion and New Atlanta's BlueDragon. Some think having alternative CFML engines makes CF less proprietary and strengthens CF overall, while others feel that it bifurcates CF and therefore weakens it. What are some of your thoughts?


Comments


I work for a very large non-profit health organization in the midwest and having an alternate engine has helped CFMX when it is called a proprietary technology. Especially when compared to .Net and J2EE, not that it should be but it happens.


I think competition is good in pretty much any arena. If you've got a viable product, you can be profitable, if you don't, then you won't. Especially in the enterprise software market, there is SO much more than the actual software to consider. One example is product support (paid or community). One thing that is missing from the CFMX/BD issue is a spec. J2EE is a formal specification, as well as a certification process for the spec. CFML, on the other hand, is whatever Macromedia makes CFMX do. Thus, you can't say what a "CFML runtime" really means. That, I think, hurts both Macromedia and New Atlanta, though the latter far moreso. Until there's a spec, CFML is absolutely a proprietary system, whether there are copycats or not. If one of those copycats can make a product that competes with CFMX, more power too them, but they're still a copycat. MM doesn't want competition, and why would they? Hence to CFML specfication, because they know that always playing catch-up will eventually beat every copycat product into the ground.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Running a Django Application on Windows Server 2012 with IIS

This is a first for me since under normal circumstances we run all our Django applications on Linux with Nginx, but we're in the process of developing an application for another department and due to the requirements around this project, we'll be handing the code off to them to deploy. They don't have any experience with Linux or web servers other than IIS, so I recently took up the challenge of figuring out how to run Django applications on Windows Server 2012 with IIS.

Based on the dated or complete lack of information around this I'm assuming it's not something that's very common in the wild, so I thought I'd share what I came up with in case others need to do this.


This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Assumptions and CaveatsThe operating system is Windows Server 2012 R2, 64-bit. If another variant of the operating system is being used, these instructions may not work properly.All of the soft…

Installing and Configuring NextPVR as a Replacement for Windows Media Center

If you follow me on Google+ you'll know I had a recent rant about Windows Media Center, which after running fine for about a year suddenly decided as of January 29 it was done downloading the program guide and by extension was therefore done recording any TV shows.

I'll spare you more ranting and simply say that none of the suggestions I got (which I appreciate!) worked, and rather than spending more time figuring out why, I decided to try something different.

NextPVR is an awesome free (as in beer, not as in freedom unfortunately ...) PVR application for Windows that with a little bit of tweaking handily replaced Windows Media Center. It can even download guide data, which is apparently something WMC no longer feels like doing.

Background I wound up going down this road in a rather circuitous way. My initial goal for the weekend project was to get Raspbmc running on one of my Raspberry Pis. The latest version of XBMC has PVR functionality so I was anxious to try that out as a …

Fixing DPI Scaling Issues in Skype for Business on Windows 10

My setup for my day job these days is a Surface Pro 4 and either an LG 34UC87M-B or a Dell P2715Q monitor, depending on where I'm working. This is a fantastic setup, but some applications have trouble dealing with the high pixel density and don't scale appropriately.
One case in point is Skype for Business. For some reason it scales correctly as I move between the Surface screen and the external monitor when I use the Dell, but on the LG monitor Skype is either massive on the external monitor, or tiny on the Surface screen.
After a big of digging around I came across a solution that worked for me, which is to change a setting in Skype's manifest file (who knew there was one?). On my machine the file is here: C:\Program Files\Microsoft Office\Office16\LYNC.EXE.MANIFEST
And the setting in question is this:
<dpiAware>True/PM</dpiAware>
Which I changed to this: <dpiAware>False/PM</dpiAware>
Note that you'll probably have to edit the file as administr…