Skip to main content

Kill the Fax Machine Already

Hopefully now that Bruce Schneier is making a stink about it people will listen. I have no idea why the fax machine still exists in the age of email, but I still get people telling me that I can't scan in a signed document and email it to them, I have to fax it. Makes less than zero sense.


Let's look at the myriad ways in which fax machines suck:



  • Totally and completely insecure, particularly if it's a real fax machine on the receiving end as opposed to an electronic fax queue (and if it's an electronic fax queue why the hell use the fax machine?). If it's a real fax machine anyone with physical access to the machine--which are usually placed in unsecured common areas--can grab anything they want off the fax machine. And on the sending side, if you go to a UPS Store or something along those lines to fax something, whatever you faxed is most likely in that fax machine's memory for any employee to re-print.


  • Slow and annoying. I won't bore you with the details, but in dealing with my 2006 taxes I had to fax the IRS a 30-page document THREE TIMES before they got it successfully. I first tried a real fax at the UPS Store, then scanned it in and did it electronically using eFax, which goes back to my earlier point. If I'm scanning it in and electronically faxing it, WHY CAN'T I JUST EMAIL IT TO YOU?


  • Antiquated and unnecessary. Fax machines should have died a miserable death 10 years ago, but for some completely nonsensical reason, people still see a fax as "more official" than email. Stop it. Seriously, stop it. There's no logical justification for that position.


I wish I could start a petition or something to kill the fax machine, but from this day forth, don't expect me to fax anyone anything ever again. The fax will likely only die if we all refuse to keep using it. And a loud "good riddance" from me once it does.


Comments



+1


I simply refuse to fax documents to people and make them give me an email address to which I can send documents.


I tell them to email scanned docs to me too.


Frankly, I wish everyone would use Adobe PDF Forms with digital signatures. So much more convenient and so easy to read.





It's so funny that you should mention this. I was at Chipotle (http://www.chipotle.com) yesterday and noticed you can fax your order in. I thought to myself, what common person would have a fax machine to fax their order these days. If anything, I would think I would be able to email it like some of the restaurants are doing like Pick-Up-Stix and Dominos etc.





Sean - even with scanning you still have to print and then scan. I'll be happy when both the fax, and physical paper, is out.





+1


Why would anyone ever wish to fax something? Also who has a landline? I have one connection in my rig, Cable internet. I couldn't use a fax if I wanted to. Why would you want to anyway?





To play devil's advocate.


I rather enjoy the tangibility of pens, paper and books. I see your point that its an inconvenience but since when did life have to be conveniently laid out for you? Is it so bad to have to get up off your butt and walk over to a fax machine? No wonder IT people are such fat asses, me included. We detest any physically inconvenient challenge.


I miss the days of satchel sized car phones, $0.25 pay phones and kids playing in their front yards, not xbox.


The point is its a trade off. You sacrifice reward for convenience. Yes yes its just a fax, but where does this end?





Faxes were the bane of my existence at least until my company got an e-fax server, now they're only slightly annoying.


But oh how I wish people would adopt digital signatures. I got tired of waiting, started using them at my company, got some other people asking about it, and next week we're rolling out our CA. Finally!



Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Installing and Configuring NextPVR as a Replacement for Windows Media Center

If you follow me on Google+ you'll know I had a recent rant about Windows Media Center, which after running fine for about a year suddenly decided as of January 29 it was done downloading the program guide and by extension was therefore done recording any TV shows.

I'll spare you more ranting and simply say that none of the suggestions I got (which I appreciate!) worked, and rather than spending more time figuring out why, I decided to try something different.

NextPVR is an awesome free (as in beer, not as in freedom unfortunately ...) PVR application for Windows that with a little bit of tweaking handily replaced Windows Media Center. It can even download guide data, which is apparently something WMC no longer feels like doing.

Background I wound up going down this road in a rather circuitous way. My initial goal for the weekend project was to get Raspbmc running on one of my Raspberry Pis. The latest version of XBMC has PVR functionality so I was anxious to try that out as a …

Setting Up Django On a Raspberry Pi

This past weekend I finally got a chance to set up one of my two Raspberry Pis to use as a Django server so I thought I'd share the steps I went through both to save someone else attempting to do this some time as well as get any feedback in case there are different/better ways to do any of this.

I'm running this from my house (URL forthcoming once I get the real Django app finalized and put on the Raspberry Pi) using dyndns.org. I don't cover that aspect of things in this post but I'm happy to write that up as well if people are interested.

General Comments and Assumptions

Using latest Raspbian “wheezy” distro as of 1/19/2013 (http://www.raspberrypi.org/downloads)We’lll be using Nginx (http://nginx.org) as the web server/proxy and Gunicorn (http://gunicorn.org) as the WSGI serverI used http://www.apreche.net/complete-single-server-django-stack-tutorial/ heavily as I was creating this, so many thanks to the author of that tutorial. If you’re looking for more details on …

The Definitive Guide to CouchDB Authentication and Security

With a bold title like that I suppose I should clarify a bit. I finally got frustrated enough with all the disparate and seemingly incomplete information on this topic to want to gather everything I know about this topic into a single place, both so I have it for my own reference but also in the hopes that it will help others.Since CouchDB is just an HTTP resource and can be secured at that level along the same lines as you'd secure any HTTP resource, I should also point out that I will not be covering things like putting a proxy in front of CouchDB, using SSL with CouchDB, or anything along those lines. This post is strictly limited to how authentication and security work within CouchDB itself.CouchDB security is powerful and granular but frankly it's also a bit quirky and counterintuitive. What I'm outlining here is my understanding of all of this after taking several runs at it, reading everything I could find on the Internet (yes, the whole Internet!), and a great deal…