Matt Woodward’s posterous

Matt Woodward’s posterous

Matthew Woodward  //  * CFML, Grails, and Java Developer
* Principal IT Specialist, US Senate
* Open BlueDragon Steering Committee Member
* All-Around Geek

Jul 14 / 5:08pm

Closing the Tech Gap | The White House

What if senior management in an Agency – or anyone in the public – could identify and monitor the performance of IT projects just as easily as they could monitor the stock market or baseball scores?  That’s what the IT dashboard does  -- and it’s changing the way government does business.

Government IT projects all too often cost millions of dollars more than they should, take years longer than necessary to deploy, and deliver technologies that are obsolete by the time they are completed. Colossal failures have contributed to a significant technology gap between the public and private sector which results in dollars wasted and a government that is less responsive to the American people.  To close the technology gap, cut waste, and modernize government, the Obama Administration is taking concrete steps to deliver better results for the American people.

I am continually floored by the efforts of the US CIO to get the bloat eliminated from government IT projects. Extremely encouraging stuff.

Filed under  //  Government   IT  

Comments (1)

Jun 28 / 1:32pm

Cutting Waste by Reforming IT | The White House

While a productivity boom has transformed private sector performance over the past two decades, the federal government has almost entirely missed this transformation and now lags far behind on efficiency and service quality.  We are wasting billions of dollars a year, and more importantly are missing out on the huge productively improvements other sectors have benefited from.

Quite simply, we can’t significantly improve the efficiency and effectiveness of the federal government without fixing IT.

Some rather astounding (albeit not surprising) numbers on some of the horrendously wasteful projects in government IT. I hope this starts a similar movement in the other branches of government, because all told this would make a massive difference in government spending, and that's rather critical right now.

Using free and open source software for all projects where it's feasible would certainly help as well.

Filed under  //  Free Software   Government   Open Source  

Comments (0)

Jun 1 / 3:18pm

Open Source Bridge - Transparent, Collaborative, Participatory - Grass Roots Implementation of the Open Government Directive

Mark Frischmuth - founder of Democracy Labs
  • current system yielding polarizing candidates that yell at each other
  • idea was we shouldbe able to use technology to inform citizens to enable better decisions
  • Obama signed open govt directive first day in office
  • data.gov
    • 270,000 data sets online
    • hundreds of applications built on top of this data
    • movement towards democratization of data
  • still not as successful in facilitating collaboration
Jim ???
  • 3dna
  • idea: if internet can bring democracy to music, etc. should be able to bring democracy to democracy
  • whitehouse2 -- how would whitehouse be run if it was truly democratic
Travis ???
  • phd in CS at UW
  • computer-human interaction
  • interested in design of platforms for facilitating public communication
  • working with city of seattle
  • cto of flashvolunteer -- neighborhood-centric volunteerism
  • works on opensim platform
??? - Democracy Lab
  • interested in having conversations that are more structure
  • open democracy can dwindle into flame wars pretty quickly
  • values-based conversation mechanism helps keep the conversation structured
Three elements of open govt directive
  • transparency, collaboration, participation
Transparency
  • data.gov--lots of info out there, but no real increase in public trust--why not?
  • not really transparency
    • lot of datapoints
    • to get true transparency you need to get beyond the data points to the root causes
      • e.g. poverty in one area vs. another -- how was data produced?
  • collaboration and participation are missing
    • if you're not being heard as citizens, you won't trust what's going on
    • without transparency, collaboration, and participation (all three) it doesn't mean much
  • long term project--can't expect open govt initiative itself would have some tangible impact in overall trust
    • 5-10-15 year project
  • how does data that's available get brought up in public discourse?
    • can have a robust dataset with a few errors, and the errors become the story in the media
  • grassroots solutions trying to solve problems govt doesn't
    • do the grassroots efforts have their own agenda?
    • goal is to improve the discourse gradually--trying to make it better in a little way
    • have to convince people the data you're getting from grassroots organizations is a little better than you'd get elsewhere
    • site like whitehouse2 doesn't even work unless it's totally transparent and people can interact freely with the data
      • have to publish everything that everyone on the site does
      • have to help people formulate opinions for and against each topic -- all on a wiki
        • anyone can edit, but it's also tracked so the changes are transparent, so easy to see who isn't participating legitimately
    • relate open govt work with open source software
      • if open source projects aren't fully open, they don't work, e.g. android -- what's the agenda? is it REALLY open?
      • contrast with apache projects--can see the mailing lists and see why decisions were made
Participation
  • in order for this to work at all we need engaged citizens
    • expressing points of view, learning, engaging, etc.
  • what tools help this?
  • this is the core issue--lots of efforts targeting getting citizens engaged
    • hard part is getting people to care
    • important to give people a voice and allow them to share this with their friends
    • in some ways if one person says what someone is saying in a "better" way, this will get shared and spread around
      • efforts can get bogged down over "what's the best way to express this"
      • open systems allow the best message rise to the top
    • single biggest way to get people involved is to have meaningful results
      • people need to see how their efforts are impacting the political process
  • current way for people to participate is to vote, and they don't
    • people don't feel their voice is being heard
    • key to systems around open govt is to make people's voices heard
    • all kind of pointless if people aren't listening though
  • have to show impact
    • very easy to think your vote doesn't count
  • work at national scale?
    • go local where outcomes are more tangible--projects that get voted on you can see the results of this in your everyday life
  • what kinds of tools will best facilitate getting the citizens' information to decision makers?
    • get decision makers to sign up and interacting
      • important to show this happening
      • e.g. peer2patent--crowdsourcing to help USPTO see prior art
        • home page shows which people submitted specific prior art associated with specific patents
    • frustrating thing about "open for questions" that obama did a few months ago
      • marijuana question showed up multiple times -- couldn't figure out how to handle this so they haven't had one since
      • why not use FAQ type format?
Collaboration
  • political issues are adversarial by nature--how best to facilitate collaboration between adversarial parties?
  • point is to enable rational discussions
    • have to operate under the assumption that people want to have a rational discussion
  • need to improve online comment boards
    • introduction of second column into online discussion that would show summary bullet points
    • introduction of neutrality into comments which are typically very subjective
    • current comment board implementations drive away people who might otherwise participate, but overly prescriptive comment systems do the same thing
  • split the issue in two
    • how do you deal with jerks/trolls?
      • set up rules--e.g. no personal attacks
      • differentiate between attacks on ideas and attacks on people
        • this didn't really work
      • created public 4-step process to eliminate trolls/jerks
        • allow others to flag people/comments
        • escalating system of warning, losing karma, up to being expelled
      • interesting thing was nobody every got a second warning -- people played along or they left of their own accord
    • how do you deal with partisanship?
      • big problem is that people couldn't agree on what the goal was so there was no common ground to be found
  • through the application of better processes we can get more people involved without worrying about solving every problem involved
Questions
  • Portland working on releasing their data, currently have about 110 datasets. Most jurisdictions are willing to participate, but there's a lot of datasets that haven't been released. Need to prove to the govt organizations that releasing the data is worth their time. What's the major catalyst to prove to politicians to release more data?
    • again, have to make clear to people that they're having an impact
      • e.g. iPhone app that lets people submit where potholes are on bike trails
    • easy to solve the "read" side of the problem, harder to solve the "write" side
    • do developer contests to get people to show what can be done with the data
    • try to do something useful with what's out there
      • target datasets with a concrete application in mind--easier to work with people in government at that point
  • If an open source project starts out closed, then goes open, it tends never to get the full benefit of being truly open. Is government ever going to be open enough?
    • tends to be generational--if developers don't start with openness in mind, it doesn't ever get there
    • with turnover, change easier to happen
    • govt isn't going to be completely transparent and open until we put people in govt who got there via the open systems
Filed under  //  Conferences   Free Software   Government   Open Source  

Comments (0)

May 26 / 9:50am

Oil reaches Louisiana shores - The Big Picture

All of the images of the aftermath of the STILL ongoing oil spill from boston.com are amazing, but this one really hit me. If we don't learn big time from this one and make serious changes in what we're doing, we deserve nothing less than what we get.

It's too bad we humans have the astoundingly bad combination of tremendous power and even more tremendous stupidity, because it's the animals and the environment that take the hit.

Filed under  //  Environment   Government  

Comments (4)

May 13 / 10:24am

Moving to the Cloud | The White House

Recovery.gov is the first government-wide system to move to the cloud. The move is part of the Administration’s overall efforts to cut waste and fix or end government programs that don’t work. By migrating to the public cloud, the Recovery Board is in position to leverage many advantages including the ability keep the site up as millions of Americans help report potential fraud, waste, and abuse. The Board expects savings of about $750,000 during its current budget cycle and significantly more savings in the long-term.

I continue to be pleasantly shocked when I see how progressive the current administration is with information technology. Very cool stuff.

Filed under  //  Cloud Computing   Government  

Comments (0)

Jan 19 / 10:12am

Open Source For America - Proposed Guidelines for Open Government Plans

Open Source for America (OSFA) represents more than 1,500 businesses, associations, non-governmental organizations, communities, and academic/research institutions who have come together to support and guide federal efforts to make the U.S. Government more open through the use of free and open source software.

I'm beyond pleased to see this taking shape. You can hit the link above and contribute to the discussion. The open government initiative should be based on open source software wherever possible, otherwise it falls short.

Filed under  //  Free Software   Government   Open Source  

Comments (1)

Dec 14 / 12:52pm

H.R. 390: College Football Playoff Act of 2009 (GovTrack.us)

To prohibit, as an unfair and deceptive act or practice, the promotion, marketing, and advertising of any post-season NCAA Division I football game as a national championship game unless such game is the culmination of a fair and equitable playoff system.

I'm oh so incredibly glad our so-called representatives see fit to waste time on such utter nonsense when the economy's in the crapper and we still don't have national health care. Bravo, morons. Here's hoping anyone anywhere near this loses their next election.

Filed under  //  Government   Idiocracy  

Comments (8)

Oct 27 / 1:15pm

powdermonkey: Department of Defense New Guidance on Open Source Software

The DoD CIO office (or ASD-NII) just has posted new open source software guidance for the whole Department of Defense! Only took about 18 months to get through, so worth it. Hopefully this puts the FUD to bed.

If it's secure enough for the Department of Defense ...

I also love that they're embracing the idea of open source as a way to better anticipate new threats. All one needs to do is look around to see that proprietary software has far more exploits than open source software, but that's still a common point of FUD.

Filed under  //  FLOSS   Government   Open Source   Security  

Comments (0)

Oct 10 / 7:59am

Open Source Could Have Saved Ontario Hundreds of Millions | Slashdot

The McMaster University researchers claim their system could be rolled out for two percent of the billion-dollars-plus already spent on the project. The report itself (PDF) also makes note of the excessive consultation spending: "By 2008, the Ministry’s eHealth Program Branch had fewer than 30 full-time employees but was engaging more than 300 consultants, a number of whom held senior management positions."

Hopefully more and more of these studies will be done on big projects and over time people will learn to at least strongly consider open source options. Especially when taxpayer money is involved it seems flat-out wrong to not investigate the potential savings offered by open source.

Filed under  //  FLOSS   Free Sofware   Government   Open Source  

Comments (2)

Oct 1 / 1:31pm

Open College Textbook Act of 2009

    Congress finds the following:

      (1) The growth of the Internet has enabled the creation and sharing of open content, including open educational resources.

        (2) The President has proposed a new, significant Federal investment in the creation of online open-source courses for community colleges that will make learning more accessible, adaptable, and affordable for students.

Really interesting stuff and very nice to see the government thinking a bit outside the box in terms of what "open source" really means. Openness is important for far more than software.

Filed under  //  Government   Open Source  

Comments (2)